Etap 22i vs Starwind 223
How do the Etap 22i and Starwind 223 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22i 
Starwind 223 | Etap 22i | Starwind 223 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 19.3 ft5.89 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.47 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,149 lb975 kg | 2,435 lb1,104 kg |
| Ballast | 518 lb235 kg | 700 lb318 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 221 ft²20.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.58 | 19.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 163 | 151 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 10.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.9 |
Etap 22i vs Starwind 223: the short version
- The Etap 22i and Starwind 223 are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.3 ft6.78 m ).
- The Starwind 223 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Starwind 223 carries the more powerful rig (19.5 vs 17.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Starwind 223 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 22i rates better for offshore work (2.51 vs 2.53).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.