Etap 23 vs Greenwich 24
How do the Etap 23 and Greenwich 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 23 | Etap 23 | Greenwich 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.2 ft7.38 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 17.4 ft5.31 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 7.3 ft2.21 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 3,320 lb1,506 kg | 3,825 lb1,735 kg |
| Ballast | 1,036 lb470 kg | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | 190 ft²17.7 m² | 255 ft²23.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.66 | 16.68 |
| Displacement / Length | 216 | 323 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.1 | 21.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Etap 23 vs Greenwich 24: the short version
- The Etap 23 and Greenwich 24 are close in length (24.2 ft7.38 m vs 24.3 ft7.39 m ).
- The Greenwich 24 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Greenwich 24 carries the more powerful rig (16.7 vs 13.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Greenwich 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Greenwich 24 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.