Etap 23 vs Weekender 24
How do the Etap 23 and Weekender 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 23 | Etap 23 | Weekender 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.2 ft7.38 m | 24.2 ft7.37 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 17.3 ft5.26 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 3,320 lb1,506 kg | 2,060 lb934 kg |
| Ballast | 1,036 lb470 kg | 1,120 lb508 kg |
| Sail area | 190 ft²17.7 m² | 218 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.66 | 21.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 216 | 179 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.1 | 14.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Etap 23 vs Weekender 24: the short version
- The Etap 23 and Weekender 24 are close in length (24.2 ft7.38 m vs 24.2 ft7.37 m ).
- The Etap 23 is heavier, displacing about 61% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Weekender 24 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 13.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Weekender 24 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.