Etap 23i vs Etap 28i
How do the Etap 23i and Etap 28i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 23i | Etap 23i | Etap 28i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.4 ft6.84 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.80 m | 23.8 ft7.25 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 10.3 ft3.12 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.46 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 3,306 lb1,500 kg | 6,173 lb2,800 kg |
| Ballast | 1,036 lb470 kg | 1,808 lb820 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 386 ft²35.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.78 | 18.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 205 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.5 | 17.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.24 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.5 |
Etap 23i vs Etap 28i: the short version
- The Etap 28i is the larger boat at 28.0 ft8.53 m LOA versus 22.4 ft6.84 m for the Etap 23i.
- The Etap 28i is heavier, displacing about 87% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 28i carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 14.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 28i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 23i rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.24).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.