Etap 23i vs Etap 35i
How do the Etap 23i and Etap 35i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 23i | Etap 23i | Etap 35i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.4 ft6.84 m | 34.8 ft10.62 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.80 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.46 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 3,306 lb1,500 kg | 11,464 lb5,200 kg |
| Ballast | 1,036 lb470 kg | 3,836 lb1,740 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 504 ft²46.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.78 | 15.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 210 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.5 | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 7.2 |
Etap 23i vs Etap 35i: the short version
- The Etap 35i is the larger boat at 34.8 ft10.62 m LOA versus 22.4 ft6.84 m for the Etap 23i.
- The Etap 35i is heavier, displacing about 247% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 35i carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 14.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 35i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 35i rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.19).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.