Etap 23i vs Tanzer 22
How do the Etap 23i and Tanzer 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 23i 
Tanzer 22 | Etap 23i | Tanzer 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.4 ft6.84 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.80 m | 19.8 ft6.02 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 7.8 ft2.39 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.46 m | 3.4 ft1.04 m |
| Displacement | 3,306 lb1,500 kg | 2,900 lb1,315 kg |
| Ballast | 1,036 lb470 kg | 1,250 lb567 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 225 ft²20.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.78 | 17.70 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 168 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.5 | 14.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.0 |
Etap 23i vs Tanzer 22: the short version
- The Etap 23i and Tanzer 22 are close in length (22.4 ft6.84 m vs 22.4 ft6.83 m ).
- The Etap 23i is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Tanzer 22 carries the more powerful rig (17.7 vs 14.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 23i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 23i rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.