Etap 26 vs Parker Dawson 26
How do the Etap 26 and Parker Dawson 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 26 | Etap 26 | Parker Dawson 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.8 ft7.85 m | 25.7 ft7.83 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.60 m | 22.2 ft6.76 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.75 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 5,084 lb2,306 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Ballast | 1,568 lb711 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 286 ft²26.6 m² | 270 ft²25.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.48 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 224 | 164 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.3 | 16.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.10 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.3 |
Etap 26 vs Parker Dawson 26: the short version
- The Etap 26 and Parker Dawson 26 are close in length (25.8 ft7.85 m vs 25.7 ft7.83 m ).
- The Etap 26 is heavier, displacing about 27% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Parker Dawson 26 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Parker Dawson 26 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.