Etap 28i vs Sea Sprite 27
How do the Etap 28i and Sea Sprite 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 28i | Etap 28i | Sea Sprite 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 27.9 ft8.51 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.25 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.12 m | 8.8 ft2.69 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 6,173 lb2,800 kg | 7,600 lb3,447 kg |
| Ballast | 1,808 lb820 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 386 ft²35.9 m² | 341 ft²31.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.35 | 14.11 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 424 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.2 | 28.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.24 | 1.80 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.0 |
Etap 28i vs Sea Sprite 27: the short version
- The Etap 28i and Sea Sprite 27 are close in length (28.0 ft8.53 m vs 27.9 ft8.51 m ).
- The Sea Sprite 27 is heavier, displacing about 23% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 28i carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 14.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sea Sprite 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sea Sprite 27 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 2.24).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.