Etap 32i vs F-31 Sport Cruiser
How do the Etap 32i and F-31 Sport Cruiser compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 32i 
F-31 Sport Cruiser | Etap 32i | F-31 Sport Cruiser | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.7 ft9.35 m | 30.8 ft9.40 m |
| Waterline length | 26.3 ft8.00 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 11.2 ft3.42 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 9,763 lb4,428 kg | 3,630 lb1,647 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 588 ft²54.6 m² | 599 ft²55.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.60 | 40.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 241 | 60 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.9 | 3.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.10 | 5.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 7.3 |
Etap 32i vs F-31 Sport Cruiser: the short version
- The Etap 32i and F-31 Sport Cruiser are close in length (30.7 ft9.35 m vs 30.8 ft9.40 m ).
- The Etap 32i is heavier, displacing about 169% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the F-31 Sport Cruiser carries the more powerful rig (40.6 vs 20.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 32i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 32i rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 5.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.