Etap 35i vs Express 35
How do the Etap 35i and Express 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 35i 
Express 35 | Etap 35i | Express 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.8 ft10.62 m | 35.0 ft10.67 m |
| Waterline length | 29.0 ft8.84 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 11,464 lb5,200 kg | 11,500 lb5,216 kg |
| Ballast | 3,836 lb1,740 kg | 5,300 lb2,404 kg |
| Sail area | 504 ft²46.8 m² | 656 ft²60.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.86 | 20.60 |
| Displacement / Length | 210 | 211 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.2 |
Etap 35i vs Express 35: the short version
- The Etap 35i and Express 35 are close in length (34.8 ft10.62 m vs 35.0 ft10.67 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Express 35 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Express 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Express 35 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.