Etap 38i vs Sabre 38
How do the Etap 38i and Sabre 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 38i | Etap 38i | Sabre 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 38.0 ft11.57 m | 37.8 ft11.53 m |
| Waterline length | 32.0 ft9.74 m | 31.2 ft9.50 m |
| Beam | 12.7 ft3.87 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 14,120 lb6,405 kg | 15,200 lb6,895 kg |
| Ballast | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 6,400 lb2,903 kg |
| Sail area | 599 ft²55.6 m² | 691 ft²64.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.41 | 18.02 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 224 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.9 | 27.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.10 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 7.5 |
Etap 38i vs Sabre 38: the short version
- The Etap 38i and Sabre 38 are close in length (38.0 ft11.57 m vs 37.8 ft11.53 m ).
- The Sabre 38 is heavier, displacing about 8% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sabre 38 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sabre 38 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sabre 38 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.