Etchells vs Hunter 30T
How do the Etchells and Hunter 30T compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etchells 
Hunter 30T | Etchells | Hunter 30T | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.2 ft9.20 m | 30.1 ft9.17 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 26.3 ft8.03 m |
| Beam | 6.9 ft2.10 m | 11.0 ft3.35 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 3,325 lb1,508 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Ballast | 2,175 lb987 kg | 3,800 lb1,724 kg |
| Sail area | 297 ft²27.6 m² | 434 ft²40.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.33 | 14.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 139 | 257 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.1 | 24.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.9 |
Etchells vs Hunter 30T: the short version
- The Etchells and Hunter 30T are close in length (30.2 ft9.20 m vs 30.1 ft9.17 m ).
- The Hunter 30T is heavier, displacing about 216% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etchells carries the more powerful rig (21.3 vs 14.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 30T scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etchells rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.