Express 27 vs Finn Express 83
How do the Express 27 and Finn Express 83 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Express 27 | Express 27 | Finn Express 83 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.3 ft8.31 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.24 m | 22.6 ft6.90 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 2,450 lb1,111 kg | 4,740 lb2,150 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 1,940 lb880 kg |
| Sail area | 276 ft²25.6 m² | 323 ft²30.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.30 | 18.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 82 | 182 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.3 | 15.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 2.19 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | — | €4,300 |
Express 27 vs Finn Express 83: the short version
- The Express 27 and Finn Express 83 are close in length (27.3 ft8.31 m vs 27.2 ft8.30 m ).
- The Finn Express 83 is heavier, displacing about 93% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Express 27 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Finn Express 83 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Finn Express 83 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.