Express 27 vs Maxi Fenix
How do the Express 27 and Maxi Fenix compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Express 27 | Express 27 | Maxi Fenix | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.3 ft8.31 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.24 m | 24.3 ft7.40 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 9.3 ft2.85 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 2,450 lb1,111 kg | 6,173 lb2,800 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 2,150 lb975 kg |
| Sail area | 276 ft²25.6 m² | 452 ft²42.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.30 | 21.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 82 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.3 | 19.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | — | €9,500 |
Express 27 vs Maxi Fenix: the short version
- The Express 27 and Maxi Fenix are close in length (27.3 ft8.31 m vs 27.2 ft8.30 m ).
- The Maxi Fenix is heavier, displacing about 152% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Express 27 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Maxi Fenix scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi Fenix rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.