Express 27 vs Wasa 270
How do the Express 27 and Wasa 270 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Express 27 | Express 27 | Wasa 270 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.3 ft8.31 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.24 m | 23.6 ft7.20 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 8.4 ft2.56 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 2,450 lb1,111 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 276 ft²25.6 m² | 360 ft²33.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.30 | 20.10 |
| Displacement / Length | 82 | 164 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.3 | 17.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | — | €18,500 |
Express 27 vs Wasa 270: the short version
- The Express 27 and Wasa 270 are close in length (27.3 ft8.31 m vs 27.2 ft8.30 m ).
- The Wasa 270 is heavier, displacing about 98% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Express 27 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 20.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Wasa 270 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Wasa 270 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.