Express 35 vs Landfall 35
How do the Express 35 and Landfall 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Express 35 
Landfall 35 | Express 35 | Landfall 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.0 ft10.67 m | 34.9 ft10.64 m |
| Waterline length | 29.0 ft8.84 m | 26.8 ft8.15 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 10.7 ft3.25 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Displacement | 11,500 lb5,216 kg | 13,000 lb5,897 kg |
| Ballast | 5,300 lb2,404 kg | 5,500 lb2,495 kg |
| Sail area | 656 ft²60.9 m² | 517 ft²48.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.60 | 14.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 211 | 303 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 29.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 1.82 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 6.9 |
Express 35 vs Landfall 35: the short version
- The Express 35 and Landfall 35 are close in length (35.0 ft10.67 m vs 34.9 ft10.64 m ).
- The Landfall 35 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Express 35 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Landfall 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Landfall 35 rates better for offshore work (1.82 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.