Fabola Scanper vs Hunter 22
How do the Fabola Scanper and Hunter 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fabola Scanper | Fabola Scanper | Hunter 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.2 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 18.3 ft5.59 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 3.2 ft0.96 m |
| Displacement | 2,976 lb1,350 kg | 3,400 lb1,542 kg |
| Ballast | 1,499 lb680 kg | 1,400 lb635 kg |
| Sail area | 253 ft²23.5 m² | 219 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.57 | 15.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 174 | 246 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.6 | 17.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.7 |
| Average used price | €1,200 | — |
Fabola Scanper vs Hunter 22: the short version
- The Fabola Scanper and Hunter 22 are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.2 ft6.78 m ).
- The Hunter 22 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fabola Scanper carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 22 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.