Fabola Scanper vs Santana 22
How do the Fabola Scanper and Santana 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fabola Scanper | Fabola Scanper | Santana 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,976 lb1,350 kg | 2,600 lb1,179 kg |
| Ballast | 1,499 lb680 kg | 1,230 lb558 kg |
| Sail area | 253 ft²23.5 m² | 218 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.57 | 18.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 174 | 176 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.18 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Average used price | €1,200 | — |
Fabola Scanper vs Santana 22: the short version
- The Fabola Scanper and Santana 22 are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.3 ft6.78 m ).
- The Fabola Scanper is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fabola Scanper carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 22 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.