Fabola Scanper vs Starwind 223
How do the Fabola Scanper and Starwind 223 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fabola Scanper 
Starwind 223 | Fabola Scanper | Starwind 223 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.3 ft5.89 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,976 lb1,350 kg | 2,435 lb1,104 kg |
| Ballast | 1,499 lb680 kg | 700 lb318 kg |
| Sail area | 253 ft²23.5 m² | 221 ft²20.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.57 | 19.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 174 | 151 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.6 | 10.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | €1,200 | — |
Fabola Scanper vs Starwind 223: the short version
- The Fabola Scanper and Starwind 223 are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.3 ft6.78 m ).
- The Fabola Scanper is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fabola Scanper carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 19.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Fabola Scanper scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Fabola Scanper rates better for offshore work (2.28 vs 2.53).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.