Facil 26 vs Parker Dawson 26
How do the Facil 26 and Parker Dawson 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Facil 26 | Facil 26 | Parker Dawson 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.81 m | 25.7 ft7.83 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.13 m | 22.2 ft6.76 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 4,630 lb2,100 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 366 ft²34.0 m² | 270 ft²25.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.08 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 254 | 164 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.6 | 16.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
Facil 26 vs Parker Dawson 26: the short version
- The Facil 26 and Parker Dawson 26 are close in length (25.6 ft7.81 m vs 25.7 ft7.83 m ).
- The Facil 26 is heavier, displacing about 16% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Facil 26 carries the more powerful rig (21.1 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Facil 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Parker Dawson 26 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.