Falmouth Cutter 22 vs Laminex Pocket Rocket
How do the Falmouth Cutter 22 and Laminex Pocket Rocket compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Falmouth Cutter 22 | Falmouth Cutter 22 | Laminex Pocket Rocket | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 20.8 ft6.35 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 7,400 lb3,357 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Ballast | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 331 ft²30.8 m² | 258 ft²24.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.95 | 23.03 |
| Displacement / Length | 366 | 108 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.8 | 8.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.64 | 2.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.2 |
Falmouth Cutter 22 vs Laminex Pocket Rocket: the short version
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 and Laminex Pocket Rocket are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 is heavier, displacing about 208% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Laminex Pocket Rocket carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 13.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Falmouth Cutter 22 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 2.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.