Falmouth Cutter 22 vs Newport 20
How do the Falmouth Cutter 22 and Newport 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Falmouth Cutter 22 Cape George Marine Works · 1980 
Newport 20 Lindsey Plastics/Capital Yachts Inc. · 1968 | Falmouth Cutter 22 | Newport 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 20.8 ft6.35 m | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 3.3 ft1.01 m |
| Displacement | 7,400 lb3,357 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Ballast | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 990 lb449 kg |
| Sail area | 331 ft²30.8 m² | 197 ft²18.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.95 | 17.11 |
| Displacement / Length | 366 | 191 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.8 | 13.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.64 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 5.7 |
Falmouth Cutter 22 vs Newport 20: the short version
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 and Newport 20 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 is heavier, displacing about 196% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Newport 20 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 13.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Falmouth Cutter 22 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.