Falmouth Cutter 22 vs Rocket 22
How do the Falmouth Cutter 22 and Rocket 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Falmouth Cutter 22 | Falmouth Cutter 22 | Rocket 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 20.8 ft6.35 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.5 ft2.58 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Displacement | 7,400 lb3,357 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Ballast | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Sail area | 331 ft²30.8 m² | 313 ft²29.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.95 | 36.61 |
| Displacement / Length | 366 | 72 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.8 | 6.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.64 | 2.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.2 |
Falmouth Cutter 22 vs Rocket 22: the short version
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 and Rocket 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 is heavier, displacing about 363% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Rocket 22 carries the more powerful rig (36.6 vs 13.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Falmouth Cutter 22 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 2.90).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.