Falsh vs Oceanite 285
How do the Falsh and Oceanite 285 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Falsh | Falsh | Oceanite 285 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 9.7 ft2.95 m | 9.7 ft2.95 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 1.9 ft0.59 m | 1.9 ft0.59 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 25 lb11 kg | 25 lb11 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.65 | 2.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Falsh vs Oceanite 285: the short version
- The Falsh and Oceanite 285 are close in length (9.7 ft2.95 m vs 9.7 ft2.95 m ).
- By the capsize screening formula the Oceanite 285 rates better for offshore work (2.65 vs 2.65).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.