Fantasia 27 vs Granada 27
How do the Fantasia 27 and Granada 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Fantasia 27 | Granada 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 27.2 ft8.28 m |
| Waterline length | 21.5 ft6.55 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.88 m | 9.1 ft2.78 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 5,027 lb2,280 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 2,646 lb1,200 kg |
| Sail area | 282 ft²26.2 m² | 404 ft²37.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.38 | 22.56 |
| Displacement / Length | 226 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.8 | 17.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.21 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | — | €11,000 |
Fantasia 27 vs Granada 27: the short version
- The Fantasia 27 and Granada 27 are close in length (27.2 ft8.30 m vs 27.2 ft8.28 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Granada 27 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Granada 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Granada 27 rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Fantasia 27