Fantasia 27 vs Hullmaster 27
How do the Fantasia 27 and Hullmaster 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fantasia 27 
Hullmaster 27 | Fantasia 27 | Hullmaster 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 27.3 ft8.31 m |
| Waterline length | 21.5 ft6.55 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.88 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 5,027 lb2,280 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 282 ft²26.2 m² | 398 ft²37.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.38 | 16.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 226 | 332 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.8 | 25.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.21 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.2 |
Fantasia 27 vs Hullmaster 27: the short version
- The Fantasia 27 and Hullmaster 27 are close in length (27.2 ft8.30 m vs 27.3 ft8.31 m ).
- The Hullmaster 27 is heavier, displacing about 47% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hullmaster 27 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hullmaster 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hullmaster 27 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.