Farrier F-22 vs Magnifik Midget
How do the Farrier F-22 and Magnifik Midget compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Farrier F-22 
Magnifik Midget | Farrier F-22 | Magnifik Midget | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.9 ft6.99 m | 23.0 ft7.00 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.78 m | 18.9 ft5.75 m |
| Beam | 18.1 ft5.51 m | 7.0 ft2.12 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 3.2 ft0.98 m |
| Displacement | 1,300 lb590 kg | 3,086 lb1,400 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,543 lb700 kg |
| Sail area | 328 ft²30.5 m² | 269 ft²25.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.06 | 20.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 53 | 205 |
| Comfort ratio | 1.9 | 17.9 |
| Capsize screening | 6.63 | 1.91 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Average used price | — | €1,200 |
Farrier F-22 vs Magnifik Midget: the short version
- The Farrier F-22 and Magnifik Midget are close in length (22.9 ft6.99 m vs 23.0 ft7.00 m ).
- The Magnifik Midget is heavier, displacing about 137% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Farrier F-22 carries the more powerful rig (44.1 vs 20.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Magnifik Midget scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Magnifik Midget rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 6.63).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.