Farrier F-22 vs Sonar
How do the Farrier F-22 and Sonar compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Farrier F-22 
Sonar | Farrier F-22 | Sonar | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.9 ft6.99 m | 23.0 ft7.00 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.78 m | 19.9 ft6.07 m |
| Beam | 18.1 ft5.51 m | 7.9 ft2.40 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 1,300 lb590 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 930 lb422 kg |
| Sail area | 328 ft²30.5 m² | 265 ft²24.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.06 | 25.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 53 | 119 |
| Comfort ratio | 1.9 | 10.0 |
| Capsize screening | 6.63 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.0 |
Farrier F-22 vs Sonar: the short version
- The Farrier F-22 and Sonar are close in length (22.9 ft6.99 m vs 23.0 ft7.00 m ).
- The Sonar is heavier, displacing about 62% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Farrier F-22 carries the more powerful rig (44.1 vs 25.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sonar scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sonar rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 6.63).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.