Finn 26 vs Hunter 26.5
How do the Finn 26 and Hunter 26.5 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Finn 26 
Hunter 26.5 | Finn 26 | Hunter 26.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.5 ft8.07 m | 26.6 ft8.10 m |
| Waterline length | 20.3 ft6.20 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 5,071 lb2,300 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 1,800 lb816 kg |
| Sail area | 409 ft²38.0 m² | 304 ft²28.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.17 | 18.11 |
| Displacement / Length | 269 | 174 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.4 | 15.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €6,100 | — |
Finn 26 vs Hunter 26.5: the short version
- The Finn 26 and Hunter 26.5 are close in length (26.5 ft8.07 m vs 26.6 ft8.10 m ).
- The Finn 26 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Finn 26 carries the more powerful rig (22.2 vs 18.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Finn 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Finn 26 rates better for offshore work (2.14 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.