Finn 26 vs Island Packet 27
How do the Finn 26 and Island Packet 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Finn 26 | Finn 26 | Island Packet 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.5 ft8.07 m | 26.5 ft8.08 m |
| Waterline length | 20.3 ft6.20 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 3.7 ft1.13 m |
| Displacement | 5,071 lb2,300 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 409 ft²38.0 m² | 405 ft²37.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.17 | 16.20 |
| Displacement / Length | 269 | 250 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.4 | 21.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | €6,100 | — |
Finn 26 vs Island Packet 27: the short version
- The Finn 26 and Island Packet 27 are close in length (26.5 ft8.07 m vs 26.5 ft8.08 m ).
- The Island Packet 27 is heavier, displacing about 58% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Finn 26 carries the more powerful rig (22.2 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Island Packet 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Island Packet 27 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.14).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.