Finn Express 83 vs Granada 27
How do the Finn Express 83 and Granada 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Finn Express 83 | Finn Express 83 | Granada 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 27.2 ft8.28 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.90 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 9.1 ft2.78 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 4,740 lb2,150 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Ballast | 1,940 lb880 kg | 2,646 lb1,200 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 404 ft²37.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.31 | 22.56 |
| Displacement / Length | 182 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 17.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €4,300 | €11,000 |
Finn Express 83 vs Granada 27: the short version
- The Finn Express 83 and Granada 27 are close in length (27.2 ft8.30 m vs 27.2 ft8.28 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Granada 27 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Granada 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Granada 27 rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.19).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.