Finn Express 83 vs Hullmaster 27
How do the Finn Express 83 and Hullmaster 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Finn Express 83 
Hullmaster 27 | Finn Express 83 | Hullmaster 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 27.3 ft8.31 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.90 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 4,740 lb2,150 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Ballast | 1,940 lb880 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 398 ft²37.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.31 | 16.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 182 | 332 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 25.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €4,300 | — |
Finn Express 83 vs Hullmaster 27: the short version
- The Finn Express 83 and Hullmaster 27 are close in length (27.2 ft8.30 m vs 27.3 ft8.31 m ).
- The Hullmaster 27 is heavier, displacing about 56% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Finn Express 83 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hullmaster 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hullmaster 27 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.19).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.