Finn Express 83 vs Maxi Fenix
How do the Finn Express 83 and Maxi Fenix compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Finn Express 83 | Finn Express 83 | Maxi Fenix | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.90 m | 24.3 ft7.40 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 9.3 ft2.85 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 4,740 lb2,150 kg | 6,173 lb2,800 kg |
| Ballast | 1,940 lb880 kg | 2,150 lb975 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 452 ft²42.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.31 | 21.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 182 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 19.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | €4,300 | €9,500 |
Finn Express 83 vs Maxi Fenix: the short version
- The Finn Express 83 and Maxi Fenix are close in length (27.2 ft8.30 m vs 27.2 ft8.30 m ).
- The Maxi Fenix is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Fenix carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Maxi Fenix scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi Fenix rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.19).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.