Finn Express 83 vs Wasa 270
How do the Finn Express 83 and Wasa 270 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Finn Express 83 | Finn Express 83 | Wasa 270 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.90 m | 23.6 ft7.20 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 8.4 ft2.56 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 4,740 lb2,150 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Ballast | 1,940 lb880 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 360 ft²33.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.31 | 20.10 |
| Displacement / Length | 182 | 164 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 17.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €4,300 | €18,500 |
Finn Express 83 vs Wasa 270: the short version
- The Finn Express 83 and Wasa 270 are close in length (27.2 ft8.30 m vs 27.2 ft8.30 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Wasa 270 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Wasa 270 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Wasa 270 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 2.19).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.