Flying Phantom Elite vs Formula 18
How do the Flying Phantom Elite and Formula 18 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Flying Phantom Elite .svg?width=960)
Formula 18 | Flying Phantom Elite | Formula 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.1 ft5.52 m | 18.1 ft5.52 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Draft | —— | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 363 lb165 kg | 397 lb180 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 253 ft²23.5 m² | 229 ft²21.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 79.55 | 67.83 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 5.52 | 4.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Flying Phantom Elite vs Formula 18: the short version
- The Flying Phantom Elite and Formula 18 are close in length (18.1 ft5.52 m vs 18.1 ft5.52 m ).
- The Formula 18 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Phantom Elite carries the more powerful rig (79.5 vs 67.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Formula 18 rates better for offshore work (4.64 vs 5.52).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.