Flying Phantom Elite vs Geary 18
How do the Flying Phantom Elite and Geary 18 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Flying Phantom Elite | Flying Phantom Elite | Geary 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.1 ft5.52 m | 18.2 ft5.54 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 5.5 ft1.66 m |
| Draft | —— | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 363 lb165 kg | 525 lb238 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 253 ft²23.5 m² | 200 ft²18.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 79.55 | 49.17 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 5.52 | 2.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Flying Phantom Elite vs Geary 18: the short version
- The Flying Phantom Elite and Geary 18 are close in length (18.1 ft5.52 m vs 18.2 ft5.54 m ).
- The Geary 18 is heavier, displacing about 45% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Phantom Elite carries the more powerful rig (79.5 vs 49.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Geary 18 rates better for offshore work (2.71 vs 5.52).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.