Flying Phantom Essentiel vs Formula 18
How do the Flying Phantom Essentiel and Formula 18 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Flying Phantom Essentiel .svg?width=960)
Formula 18 | Flying Phantom Essentiel | Formula 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 18.1 ft5.52 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.55 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Draft | —— | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 375 lb170 kg | 397 lb180 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 236 ft²21.9 m² | 229 ft²21.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 72.61 | 67.83 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 4.64 | 4.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Flying Phantom Essentiel vs Formula 18: the short version
- The Flying Phantom Essentiel and Formula 18 are close in length (18.0 ft5.50 m vs 18.1 ft5.52 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Phantom Essentiel carries the more powerful rig (72.6 vs 67.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Formula 18 rates better for offshore work (4.64 vs 4.64).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.