Flying Scot vs Hunter 19-2
How do the Flying Scot and Hunter 19-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Flying Scot 
Hunter 19-2 | Flying Scot | Hunter 19-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 19.0 ft5.79 m |
| Waterline length | 18.5 ft5.64 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Beam | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 850 lb386 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 191 ft²17.7 m² | 167 ft²15.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 34.06 | 16.83 |
| Displacement / Length | 60 | 221 |
| Comfort ratio | 5.5 | 12.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.85 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.3 |
Flying Scot vs Hunter 19-2: the short version
- The Flying Scot and Hunter 19-2 are close in length (19.0 ft5.79 m vs 19.0 ft5.79 m ).
- The Hunter 19-2 is heavier, displacing about 135% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Scot carries the more powerful rig (34.1 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 19-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 19-2 rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 2.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.