Flying Scot vs Hunter 19 (Europa)
How do the Flying Scot and Hunter 19 (Europa) compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Flying Scot 
Hunter 19 (Europa) | Flying Scot | Hunter 19 (Europa) | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 19.0 ft5.78 m |
| Waterline length | 18.5 ft5.64 m | 17.2 ft5.24 m |
| Beam | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 6.1 ft1.87 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 850 lb386 kg | 1,501 lb681 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 750 lb340 kg |
| Sail area | 191 ft²17.7 m² | 152 ft²14.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 34.06 | 18.55 |
| Displacement / Length | 60 | 132 |
| Comfort ratio | 5.5 | 11.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.85 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Flying Scot vs Hunter 19 (Europa): the short version
- The Flying Scot and Hunter 19 (Europa) are close in length (19.0 ft5.79 m vs 19.0 ft5.78 m ).
- The Hunter 19 (Europa) is heavier, displacing about 77% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Scot carries the more powerful rig (34.1 vs 18.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 19 (Europa) scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 19 (Europa) rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.