Flying Scot vs Mirror Offshore MK1
How do the Flying Scot and Mirror Offshore MK1 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Flying Scot 
Mirror Offshore MK1 | Flying Scot | Mirror Offshore MK1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 18.9 ft5.75 m |
| Waterline length | 18.5 ft5.64 m | 15.8 ft4.80 m |
| Beam | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 6.7 ft2.05 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 1.9 ft0.58 m |
| Displacement | 850 lb386 kg | 1,799 lb816 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 379 lb172 kg |
| Sail area | 191 ft²17.7 m² | 122 ft²11.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 34.06 | 13.20 |
| Displacement / Length | 60 | 206 |
| Comfort ratio | 5.5 | 13.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.85 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.3 |
| Average used price | — | €900 |
Flying Scot vs Mirror Offshore MK1: the short version
- The Flying Scot and Mirror Offshore MK1 are close in length (19.0 ft5.79 m vs 18.9 ft5.75 m ).
- The Mirror Offshore MK1 is heavier, displacing about 112% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Scot carries the more powerful rig (34.1 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mirror Offshore MK1 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mirror Offshore MK1 rates better for offshore work (2.21 vs 2.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.