Flying Scot vs Rhodes 19
How do the Flying Scot and Rhodes 19 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Flying Scot 
Rhodes 19 | Flying Scot | Rhodes 19 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 19.2 ft5.84 m |
| Waterline length | 18.5 ft5.64 m | 17.8 ft5.41 m |
| Beam | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.3 ft0.99 m |
| Displacement | 850 lb386 kg | 1,325 lb601 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 428 lb194 kg |
| Sail area | 191 ft²17.7 m² | 167 ft²15.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 34.06 | 22.15 |
| Displacement / Length | 60 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 5.5 | 8.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.85 | 2.55 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Flying Scot vs Rhodes 19: the short version
- The Flying Scot and Rhodes 19 are close in length (19.0 ft5.79 m vs 19.2 ft5.84 m ).
- The Rhodes 19 is heavier, displacing about 56% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Scot carries the more powerful rig (34.1 vs 22.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Rhodes 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Rhodes 19 rates better for offshore work (2.55 vs 2.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.