Freedom 25 vs Mariehom IF
How do the Freedom 25 and Mariehom IF compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Freedom 25 | Freedom 25 | Mariehom IF | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.7 ft7.82 m | 25.8 ft7.86 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 19.9 ft6.05 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 4.0 ft1.21 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Ballast | 1,025 lb465 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 260 ft²24.2 m² | 280 ft²26.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.05 | 15.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 195 | 277 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.4 | 24.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.24 | 1.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €2,900 |
Freedom 25 vs Mariehom IF: the short version
- The Freedom 25 and Mariehom IF are close in length (25.7 ft7.82 m vs 25.8 ft7.86 m ).
- The Mariehom IF is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Freedom 25 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mariehom IF scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mariehom IF rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 2.24).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.