Freedom 39 PH vs Nautical 39
How do the Freedom 39 PH and Nautical 39 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Freedom 39 PH | Freedom 39 PH | Nautical 39 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.0 ft11.89 m | 39.0 ft11.89 m |
| Waterline length | 31.0 ft9.45 m | 32.5 ft9.91 m |
| Beam | 12.8 ft3.91 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 18,500 lb8,391 kg | 22,500 lb10,206 kg |
| Ballast | 5,300 lb2,404 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 744 ft²69.1 m² | 677 ft²62.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.02 | 13.59 |
| Displacement / Length | 277 | 293 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.6 | 36.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.94 | 1.70 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.6 |
Freedom 39 PH vs Nautical 39: the short version
- The Freedom 39 PH and Nautical 39 are close in length (39.0 ft11.89 m vs 39.0 ft11.89 m ).
- The Nautical 39 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Freedom 39 PH carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 13.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nautical 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nautical 39 rates better for offshore work (1.70 vs 1.94).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.