Frigate 36 vs Hunter 36 Legend
How do the Frigate 36 and Hunter 36 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Frigate 36 
Hunter 36 Legend | Frigate 36 | Hunter 36 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.7 ft10.87 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | 24.4 ft7.44 m | 31.5 ft9.61 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.11 m | 12.3 ft3.76 m |
| Draft | 7.2 ft2.18 m | 6.8 ft2.08 m |
| Displacement | 11,575 lb5,250 kg | 14,330 lb6,500 kg |
| Ballast | 5,200 lb2,359 kg | 5,132 lb2,328 kg |
| Sail area | 511 ft²47.5 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.98 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 355 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.2 | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.80 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.5 |
Frigate 36 vs Hunter 36 Legend: the short version
- The Frigate 36 and Hunter 36 Legend are close in length (35.7 ft10.87 m vs 35.7 ft10.89 m ).
- The Hunter 36 Legend is heavier, displacing about 24% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 36 Legend carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Frigate 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Frigate 36 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.