Fun 23 vs Precision 23
How do the Fun 23 and Precision 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fun 23 
Precision 23 | Fun 23 | Precision 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.3 ft7.11 m | 23.4 ft7.14 m |
| Waterline length | 17.9 ft5.46 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 1,875 lb850 kg | 2,450 lb1,111 kg |
| Ballast | 760 lb345 kg | 850 lb386 kg |
| Sail area | 243 ft²22.6 m² | 247 ft²22.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.57 | 21.75 |
| Displacement / Length | 145 | 137 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.3 | 10.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.60 | 2.52 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 6.0 |
Fun 23 vs Precision 23: the short version
- The Fun 23 and Precision 23 are close in length (23.3 ft7.11 m vs 23.4 ft7.14 m ).
- The Precision 23 is heavier, displacing about 31% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fun 23 carries the more powerful rig (25.6 vs 21.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Precision 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Precision 23 rates better for offshore work (2.52 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.