Fun 23 vs Schock 23
How do the Fun 23 and Schock 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fun 23 
Schock 23 | Fun 23 | Schock 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.3 ft7.11 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 17.9 ft5.46 m | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 2.9 ft0.89 m |
| Displacement | 1,875 lb850 kg | 2,800 lb1,270 kg |
| Ballast | 760 lb345 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 243 ft²22.6 m² | 267 ft²24.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.57 | 21.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 145 | 142 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.3 | 11.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.60 | 2.41 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 6.1 |
Fun 23 vs Schock 23: the short version
- The Fun 23 and Schock 23 are close in length (23.3 ft7.11 m vs 23.3 ft7.11 m ).
- The Schock 23 is heavier, displacing about 49% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fun 23 carries the more powerful rig (25.6 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Schock 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Schock 23 rates better for offshore work (2.41 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.