Fun 23 vs Stone Horse
How do the Fun 23 and Stone Horse compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fun 23 | Fun 23 | Stone Horse | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.3 ft7.11 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 17.9 ft5.46 m | 18.3 ft5.59 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.1 ft2.16 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 1,875 lb850 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 760 lb345 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Sail area | 243 ft²22.6 m² | 315 ft²29.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.57 | 18.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 145 | 326 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.3 | 25.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.60 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.7 |
Fun 23 vs Stone Horse: the short version
- The Fun 23 and Stone Horse are close in length (23.3 ft7.11 m vs 23.3 ft7.11 m ).
- The Stone Horse is heavier, displacing about 140% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fun 23 carries the more powerful rig (25.6 vs 18.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Stone Horse scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Stone Horse rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.