Fun 23 vs Sun Odyssey 349
How do the Fun 23 and Sun Odyssey 349 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fun 23 
Sun Odyssey 349 | Fun 23 | Sun Odyssey 349 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.3 ft7.11 m | 33.9 ft10.34 m |
| Waterline length | 17.9 ft5.46 m | 30.8 ft9.40 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 11.3 ft3.44 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 1,875 lb850 kg | 11,795 lb5,350 kg |
| Ballast | 760 lb345 kg | 3,483 lb1,580 kg |
| Sail area | 243 ft²22.6 m² | 547 ft²50.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.57 | 16.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 145 | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.3 | 22.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.60 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 7.4 |
Fun 23 vs Sun Odyssey 349: the short version
- The Sun Odyssey 349 is the larger boat at 33.9 ft10.34 m LOA versus 23.3 ft7.11 m for the Fun 23.
- The Sun Odyssey 349 is heavier, displacing about 529% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fun 23 carries the more powerful rig (25.6 vs 16.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sun Odyssey 349 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sun Odyssey 349 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.