Fun 380 vs Run
How do the Fun 380 and Run compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fun 380 | Fun 380 | Run | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.5 ft3.80 m | 12.5 ft3.80 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 2.2 ft0.67 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 37 lb17 kg | 42 lb19 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.68 | 2.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Fun 380 vs Run: the short version
- The Fun 380 and Run are close in length (12.5 ft3.80 m vs 12.5 ft3.80 m ).
- The Run is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Run rates better for offshore work (2.53 vs 2.68).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.