Goderich 35 vs Hunter 36 Legend
How do the Goderich 35 and Hunter 36 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Goderich 35 
Hunter 36 Legend | Goderich 35 | Hunter 36 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.7 ft10.87 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | 28.3 ft8.63 m | 31.5 ft9.61 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 12.3 ft3.76 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 6.8 ft2.08 m |
| Displacement | 17,000 lb7,711 kg | 14,330 lb6,500 kg |
| Ballast | 6,200 lb2,812 kg | 5,132 lb2,328 kg |
| Sail area | 649 ft²60.3 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.71 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 334 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.3 | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.79 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 7.5 |
Goderich 35 vs Hunter 36 Legend: the short version
- The Goderich 35 and Hunter 36 Legend are close in length (35.7 ft10.87 m vs 35.7 ft10.89 m ).
- The Goderich 35 is heavier, displacing about 19% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 36 Legend carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 15.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Goderich 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Goderich 35 rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.